Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream README has been changed, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our `README.md`.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Change the code style to match upstream's but otherwise do not change our
code.
- `spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Kept our version, since the tests are mostly glitch-soc's, except for cases
which are purposefuly different.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Upstream made changes while we have dropped this file.
Keep the file deleted.
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream made changes at the end of the file, where we
had our extra lines.
Just moved our extra lines back at the end.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end, glitch-soc had extra entries at the end.
Added upstream's new line before glitch-soc's.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Upstream updated dependencies while glitch-soc has an extra one (hcaptcha).
Updated dependencies like upstream did.
- `app/controllers/api/v1/statuses_controller.rb`:
Not a real conflict, upstream added a parameter (`allowed_mentions`) where
glitch-soc already had an extra one (`content_type`).
Added upstream's new parameter.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto-mono.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
- `app/javascript/styles/fonts/roboto.scss`:
A lot of lines were changed upstream due to code style changes, and a lot
of those lines had path changes to accomodate glitch-soc's theming system.
Applied upstream's style changes.
* Add a limit to how many posts can get fetched as a result of a single request
* Add tests
* Always pass `request_id` when processing `Announce` activities
---------
Co-authored-by: nametoolong <nametoolong@users.noreply.github.com>
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Minor upstream change, our README is completely different.
Kept ours.
- `lib/tasks/assets.rake`:
glitch-soc has extra code to deal with its theming system,
upstream changed a line that exists in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added new ignored strings, glitch-soc has extra ignored strings
because of the theming system.
Added upstream's changes.
* Return specific error on failure to parse Date header
* Add error message when preferredUsername is not set
* Change error report to be JSON and include more details
* Change error report to differentiate unknown account and failed refresh
* Add tests
Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Minor upstream refactor moved hook definitions around,
and glitch-soc has an extra `before_create`.
Moved the `before_create` accordingly.
- `app/services/batched_remove_status_service.rb`:
Minor upstream refactor changed a block in which glitch-soc
had one extra call to handle direct timelines.
Adapted changes to keep glitch-soc's extra call.
* fix(status): remove send usage for private unlink_from_conversations
- make unlink_from_conversations public method
- rename unlink_from_conversations to unlink_from_conversations!
- fix send call on private method in statuses_vacuum and batched_remove_status_service
* fix(feeds_vacuum): replace find_in_batches with in_batches
because active record query results should be a little more efficient than
itterating with map and each. Postgres can grasp such lists of ids much quicker
than ruby can.
Will probably make allmost no difference, but cannot hurt either.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, while we have a completely different one.
Kept our README.
- `app/controllers/concerns/web_app_controller_concern.rb`:
Conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Additionally, glitch-soc has different behavior regarding moved accounts.
Ported some of the changes, but kept our overall behavior.
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Code changes actually applied to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`
* Fix possible race conditions when suspending/unsuspending accounts
* Fix tests
Tests were assuming SuspensionWorker and UnsuspensionWorker would do the
suspending/unsuspending themselves, but this has changed.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
There is an idempotency key generated by clients when authoring a post,
and stored in Redis, to ensure that if a user or client retries posting
the same status, we don't get a duplicate.
Hachyderm.io has been experiencing some filesystem and database
performance issues, causing database writes to be slow. This can mean
that there are successful posts, but the reverse proxy returns 504
Gateway Timeout before the idempotency status has been updated; users or
clients who retry (such as Tusky which retries automatically, see
tuskyapp/Tusky#2951) can re-try the same post with the same idempotency
key before it has actually been recorded in Redis, leading to duplicate
posts.
To address this issue, move all of the database updates after the
initial transaction that creates the status into the
`postprocess_status!` method, so we can insert the idempotency key
immediately after the status has been created, significantly reducing
the window in which the status could be created but the idempotency key
not yet stored.
Note: this has not yet been tested; I'm submitting this PR for
discussion and to offer to the Hachyderm.io admins to try out to fix the
multiple posting problem.
Co-authored-by: Brian Campbell <brcampbell@beta.team>
* Fix trying to fetch posts from other users when fetching featured posts
* Rate-limit discovery of new subdomains
* Put a limit on recursively discovering new accounts
* Fix trying to fetch posts from other users when fetching featured posts
* Rate-limit discovery of new subdomains
* Put a limit on recursively discovering new accounts
