Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Upstream added lines close to a glitch-soc only line, not a real conflict.
Applied upstream's changes (added hooks) while keeping glitch-soc's changes
(`local_only` scope).
- `config/environments/production.rb`:
Upstream removed a header, while we have glitch-soc specific ones.
Removed the header removed upstream.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream changed their README, we have our own.
Kept ours.
- `app/helpers/application_helper.rb`:
Minor code style fix upstream, on a line that is different in glitch-soc
due to the different theming system.
Applied the code style fix to our own code.
- `app/views/settings/preferences/appearance/show.html.haml`:
Code style fix on a line next to lines exclusive to glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream updated a dependency textually close to a glitch-soc-only
dependency.
Updated the dependency like upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream switched to pushing to both DockerHub and GitHub Container
Repository, while glitch-soc was already pushing to the latter only.
Updated our configuration to be slightly more consistent with upstream's
naming and styling, but kept our behavior.
- `Gemfile.lock`:
Updated dependencies textually too close to glitch-soc only hcaptcha
dependency.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our README, though it probably should be reworked at some point.
- `app/views/auth/sessions/two_factor.html.haml`:
Minor style fix upstream that's on a line glitch-soc removed because
of its different theming system.
Kept our file as is.
- `spec/controllers/health_controller_spec.rb`:
This file apparently did not exist upstream, upstream created it with
different contents but it is functionally the same.
Switched to upstream's version of the file.
- `spec/presenters/instance_presenter_spec.rb`:
Upstream changed the specs around `GITHUB_REPOSITORY`, while glitch-soc
had its own code because it's a fork and does not have the same default
source URL.
Took upstream's change, but with glitch-soc's repo as the default case.
- `yarn.lock`:
Upstream dependencies textually too close to a glitch-soc only one.
Updated dependencies as upstream did.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream README has been changed, but we have a completely different one.
Kept our `README.md`.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Change the code style to match upstream's but otherwise do not change our
code.
- `spec/lib/sanitize_config_spec.rb`:
Upstream added support for more incoming HTML tags (a large subset of what
glitch-soc accepts).
Kept our version, since the tests are mostly glitch-soc's, except for cases
which are purposefuly different.
Conflicts:
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream added a line at the end of the file, while glitch-soc had its own
extra lines.
Took upstream's change.
- `CONTRIBUTING.md`:
We have our custom CONTRIBUTING.md quoting upstream. Upstream made changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/controllers/application_controller.rb`:
Upstream made code style changes in a method that is entirely replaced
in glitch-soc.
Ignored the change.
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Code style changes textually close to glitch-soc-specific changes.
Ported upstream changes.
- `lib/sanitize_ext/sanitize_config.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Ignored them.
Conflicts:
- `.github/dependabot.yml`:
Upstream made changes while we have dropped this file.
Keep the file deleted.
- `.prettierignore`:
Upstream made changes at the end of the file, where we
had our extra lines.
Just moved our extra lines back at the end.
- `app/serializers/initial_state_serializer.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
- `app/services/backup_service.rb`:
Upstream code style changes.
Applied them.
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Minor upstream change, our README is completely different.
Kept ours.
- `lib/tasks/assets.rake`:
glitch-soc has extra code to deal with its theming system,
upstream changed a line that exists in glitch-soc.
Applied upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `config/i18n-tasks.yml`:
Upstream added new ignored strings, glitch-soc has extra ignored strings
because of the theming system.
Added upstream's changes.
* Validate internal actor
* Use “internal.actor” by default for the server actor username
* Fix instance actor username on the fly if it includes ':'
* Change actor name from internal.actor to mastodon.internal
* Do not offer to mark statuses as sensitive if there is no undeleted status with media attachments
* Fix crash when marking statuses as sensitive while some statuses are deleted
Fixes#21910
* Fix multiple strikes being created for a single report when selecting “Mark as sensitive”
* Add tests
Conflicts:
- `app/models/status.rb`:
Minor upstream refactor moved hook definitions around,
and glitch-soc has an extra `before_create`.
Moved the `before_create` accordingly.
- `app/services/batched_remove_status_service.rb`:
Minor upstream refactor changed a block in which glitch-soc
had one extra call to handle direct timelines.
Adapted changes to keep glitch-soc's extra call.
* fix(status): remove send usage for private unlink_from_conversations
- make unlink_from_conversations public method
- rename unlink_from_conversations to unlink_from_conversations!
- fix send call on private method in statuses_vacuum and batched_remove_status_service
* fix(feeds_vacuum): replace find_in_batches with in_batches
because active record query results should be a little more efficient than
itterating with map and each. Postgres can grasp such lists of ids much quicker
than ruby can.
Will probably make allmost no difference, but cannot hurt either.
* Make autosuggest for mentions return followed accounts first
This makes it so that (when elasticsearch is disabled) when a user types '@foo' in the compose box, they are first going to get accounts they follow ordered by the ranking algorithm, and then second they will get accounts they do not follow, also ordered by the ranking algorithm.
This makes behavior more consistent with user expectation and also with results when elasticsearch is enabled.
* Fix ranking order to correct direction
* One more fixup per @gargron suggestion
* Tweak to ranking to no longer include following modifier
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Upstream updated its README, while we have a completely different one.
Kept our README.
- `app/controllers/concerns/web_app_controller_concern.rb`:
Conflict because of glitch-soc's theming system.
Additionally, glitch-soc has different behavior regarding moved accounts.
Ported some of the changes, but kept our overall behavior.
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Code changes actually applied to `app/javascript/core/admin.js`
Conflicts:
- `README.md`:
Discarded upstream changes: we have our own README
- `app/controllers/follower_accounts_controller.rb`:
Port upstream's minor refactoring
* Clear sessions on password change
* Rename User::clear_sessions to revoke_access for a clearer meaning
* Add reset paassword controller test
* Use User.find instead of User.find_for_authentication for reset password test
* Use redirect and render for better test meaning in reset password
Co-authored-by: Effy Elden <effy@effy.space>
Conflicts:
- `app/models/concerns/domain_materializable.rb`:
Fixed a code style issue upstream in a PR that got merged in glitch-soc
earlier.
Changed the code to match upstream's.
* Fix trying to fetch posts from other users when fetching featured posts
* Rate-limit discovery of new subdomains
* Put a limit on recursively discovering new accounts
* Fix trying to fetch posts from other users when fetching featured posts
* Rate-limit discovery of new subdomains
* Put a limit on recursively discovering new accounts
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): remove dead code - unused
Method is not called inside class and private.
Clean up dead code.
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): make retention_period present test explicit
This private method only hides functionality.
It is best practice to be as explicit as possible.
* refactor(statuses_vacuum): improve query performance
- fix statuses_scope having sub-select for Account.remote scope by
`joins(:account).merge(Account.remote)`
- fix statuses_scope unnecessary use of `Status.arel_table[:id].lt`
because it is inexplicit, bad practice and even slower than normal
`.where('statuses.id < ?'`
- fix statuses_scope remove select(:id, :visibility) for having reusable
active record query batches (no re queries)
- fix vacuum_statuses! to use in_batches instead of find_in_batches,
because in_batches delivers a full blown active record query result,
in stead of an array - no requeries necessary
- send(:unlink_from_conversations) not to perform another db query, but
reuse the in_batches result instead.
- remove now obsolete remove_from_account_conversations method
- remove_from_search_index uses array of ids, instead of mapping
the ids from an array - this should be more efficient
- use the in_batches scope to call delete_all, instead of running
another db query for this - because it is again more efficient
- add TODO comment for calling models private method with send
* refactor(status): simplify unlink_from_conversations
- add `has_many through:` relation mentioned_accounts
- use model scope local instead of method call `Status#local?`
- more readable add account to inbox_owners when account.local?
* refactor(status): searchable_by way less sub selects
These queries all included a sub-select. Doing the same with a joins
should be more efficient.
Since this method does 5 such queries, this should be significant,
since it technically halves the query count.
This is how it was:
```ruby
[3] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.where(account: Account.local, silent: false).explain
Status Load (1.6ms) SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1]]
Mention Load (1.5ms) SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "mentions"."account_id" IN (SELECT "accounts"."id" FROM "accounts" WHERE "accounts"."domain" IS NULL) AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
-> Seq Scan on accounts (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
Filter: (domain IS NULL)
-> Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```
This is how it is with this change:
```ruby
[4] pry(main)> Status.first.mentions.joins(:account).merge(Account.local).active.explain
Status Load (1.7ms) SELECT "statuses".* FROM "statuses" WHERE "statuses"."deleted_at" IS NULL ORDER BY "statuses"."id" DESC LIMIT $1 [["LIMIT", 1]]
Mention Load (0.7ms) SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
=> EXPLAIN for: SELECT "mentions".* FROM "mentions" INNER JOIN "accounts" ON "accounts"."id" = "mentions"."account_id" WHERE "mentions"."status_id" = $1 AND "accounts"."domain" IS NULL AND "mentions"."silent" = $2 [["status_id", 109382923142288414], ["silent", false]]
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=0.15..23.08 rows=1 width=41)
-> Seq Scan on accounts (cost=0.00..10.90 rows=1 width=8)
Filter: (domain IS NULL)
-> Index Scan using index_mentions_on_account_id_and_status_id on mentions (cost=0.15..8.17 rows=1 width=41)
Index Cond: ((account_id = accounts.id) AND (status_id = '109382923142288414'::bigint))
Filter: (NOT silent)
(6 rows)
```
When a poll is edited, we reset the poll and remove all previous
votes. However, prior to this commit, the voter count on the poll
was not reset. This leads to incorrect percentages being shown in
poll results.
Fixes#21696
* Don't allow URLs that contain non-normalized paths to be verified
This stops things like https://example.com/otheruser/../realuser where
"/otheruser" appears to be the verified URL, but the actual URL being
verified is "/realuser" due to the "/../".
Also fix a test to use 'https', so it is testing the right thing, now
that since #20304 https is required.
* missing do
Conflicts:
- `.github/workflows/build-image.yml`:
Upstream changed how docker images were built, including how
they were cached.
I don't know much about it, so applied upstream's changes.
- `app/controllers/admin/domain_blocks_controller.rb`:
The feature, that was in glitch-soc, got backported upstream.
It also had a few fixes upstream, so those have been ported!
- `app/javascript/packs/admin.js`:
Glitch-soc changes have been backported upstream. As a result,
some code from `app/javascript/core/admin.js` got added upstream.
Kept our version since our shared Javascript already has that feature.
- `app/models/user.rb`:
Upstream added something to distinguish unusable and unusable-because-moved
accounts, while glitch-soc considers moved accounts usable.
Took upstream's code for `functional_or_moved?` and made `functional?`
call it.
- `app/views/statuses/_simple_status.html.haml`:
Upstream cleaned up code style a bit, on a line that we had custom changes
for.
Applied upstream's change while keeping our change.
- `config/initializers/content_security_policy.rb`:
Upstream adopted one CSP directive we already had.
The conflict is because of our files being structurally different, but the
change itself was already part of glitch-soc.
Kept our version.
Conflicts:
- `app/views/admin/announcements/edit.html.haml`:
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
- `app/views/admin/announcements/new.html.haml`
Upstream change too close to theming-related glitch-soc change.
Ported upstream changes.
Conflicts:
- `app/models/account.rb`:
Conflict because we (glitch-soc) have disabled trending of posts without
review.
Discarded that upstream change.
- `app/views/admin/settings/discovery/show.html.haml`:
Just an extra setting in glitch-soc.
Kept that extra setting.
